Editor's Picks + Features

96981468_a0f0402afb

My Toronto Video Contest Voting Page

Example description of page.

4843752478_f5b5e2cc1b_b

A 72 Year Crossing at Yonge and Bloor

"A 72 Year Crossing at Yonge and Bloor" Comparative...

4837950162_c923bb1d6e

STREET SCENE: Linux Cafe

Street Scene will appear each week showcasing the...

IMG_0702

Farm Friday: Evergreen Brick Works

Name: Evergreen Brick Works Farmers' Market Location:...

4662198802_8615cf0d2d_b

SPACING VOTES WEEKLY: Coach Ford, Smitherman walks & a heated TV debate

EDITOR’S NOTE: Spacing Votes — our dedicated 2010...

spacing-radio-votes-smither

SPACING RADIO: Smitherman talks walking, while walking

LISTEN TO THIS SPACING RADIO PODCAST George Smitherman...

congestion_referendum

IDEAS FOR TORONTO: Infrastructure referendums

The Toronto City Summit Alliance held a roundtable...

4790754465_e783015c3d_z

Bike parking takes over car parking spaces

Toronto bike riders can celebrate a "first" today:...

4706528245_ef676de151_b

Cities for People — New Toronto design intervention

This is part of a series of posts by students in...

3677103134_da0a274434_z

LORINC: Greenwashing by any other name

I normally have a lot of time for the Toronto Environmental...

4814694220_7da9ea9331

World Wide Wednesday: Maps, Trains, Trikes and Three Million on the A40

Each week we will be focusing on blogs from around...

Creating Connections: another option for the Gardiner

The Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation recently released a report (PDF) outlining four different options for dealing with the Gardiner Expressway. The options, ranging from doing nothing to creating a "Great Street" along Lakeshore Boulevard, were not exactly greeted with universal acclaim. Jose Gutierrez's Toronto Waterfront Viaduct presents a different vision for the Waterfront, one that acknowledges the need to replace the Gardiner with a major transportation corridor, eliminate barriers to the Waterfront, and, most importantly, create connections between the city and its greatest resource.

Spacing asked our Waterfront reporter Ian Malczewski to shed some light on the the specifics of the Viaduct's article. Read Ian's article.

 

Comments

Neither the author nor Spacing necessarily agree with the comments posted below. Spacing reserves the right to edit or delete comments entirely. See our Comment Policy.

Gutierrez's proposal is not unlike a proposal Bruce Mau made a few years ago in Toronto Life Magazine. He suggested making a much higher viaduct with some kind of transparent pipe enclosing the roadway.

Comment by Michael
October 18, 2006 | 8:36 pm

personally i love the viaduct idea, but the cheapest solution i have seen is like what london did with theirs

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=1f45a493-3ab4-4d1c-ad15-1e78e3ab4d5f&k=86327

I am a candidate for councillor in Ward 25, and I fully support the TWV plan. I met with the architect, Jose, and he gave me an hour-long presentation. While Adam Vaughan makes an excellent point about the increased traffic and pollution, we must also realize that cars idling on the crumbling Gardiner must be remedied, and these gas-powered vehicles will soon be replaced by electric ones. The TWV also provides for a rapid public transit line, and below it the skyPATH offers enclosed green space, cycling and pedestrian paths, and will not harm the railway lanes 20 feet below. The cost can be offset considerably by charging a road toll. It is estimated to be completed in 2-3 years. It seems like the perfect solution to me for the City of Toronto.
-John Blair, Candidate for Toronto City Council
Ward 25 (Don Valley West)

I'd just like to say that the article about the congestion charge is total nonsense.

The Gardiner is a main route. The congestion charge here in London is very different, it covers a whole area of the city. What it would amount to is making the Gardiner into a toll road, hardly creative thinking.

 
Post a comment
Creating Connections: another option for the Gardiner
By