Editor's Picks + Features

96981468_a0f0402afb

My Toronto Video Contest Voting Page

Example description of page.

4843752478_f5b5e2cc1b_b

A 72 Year Crossing at Yonge and Bloor

"A 72 Year Crossing at Yonge and Bloor" Comparative...

4837950162_c923bb1d6e

STREET SCENE: Linux Cafe

Street Scene will appear each week showcasing the...

IMG_0702

Farm Friday: Evergreen Brick Works

Name: Evergreen Brick Works Farmers' Market Location:...

4662198802_8615cf0d2d_b

SPACING VOTES WEEKLY: Coach Ford, Smitherman walks & a heated TV debate

EDITOR’S NOTE: Spacing Votes — our dedicated 2010...

spacing-radio-votes-smither

SPACING RADIO: Smitherman talks walking, while walking

LISTEN TO THIS SPACING RADIO PODCAST George Smitherman...

congestion_referendum

IDEAS FOR TORONTO: Infrastructure referendums

The Toronto City Summit Alliance held a roundtable...

4790754465_e783015c3d_z

Bike parking takes over car parking spaces

Toronto bike riders can celebrate a "first" today:...

4706528245_ef676de151_b

Cities for People — New Toronto design intervention

This is part of a series of posts by students in...

3677103134_da0a274434_z

LORINC: Greenwashing by any other name

I normally have a lot of time for the Toronto Environmental...

4814694220_7da9ea9331

World Wide Wednesday: Maps, Trains, Trikes and Three Million on the A40

Each week we will be focusing on blogs from around...

Police Board Begins Web Streaming

 

Update: 11:30PM

The Toronto Police Services Board is web streaming its first meeting this afternoon, courtesy Rogers Television, the same service used to broadcast and webcast Toronto City Council meetings.

While not all City agencies, boards, commissions and committees can easily stream their meetings online, the meeting rooms used by the TPSB are already equipped with the necessary cameras and equipment to stream proceedings.

In a similar vein, at the June City Council meeting, councillors Michael Walker and Karen Stintz put forward a motion [PDF] asking that Council request the Rogers community television station to broadcast Executive Committee meetings on Toronto's channel 10.

Unfortunately, the motion at Council was referred to the Executive Committee, which decided to defer consideration until after the City implements its 311 service. 311 has been on the books for five years and its implementation date is still undefined. Why broadcasting meetings would be tied to 311 mystifies this writer, particularly because Executive Committee meetings are already broadcast within City Hall for the benefit of councillors, their staff and senior bureaucrats.

Update: City spokesperson Rob Andrusevic provided Spacing with a response that is potentially contradictory to what the decision document [PDF] for the September 2, 2008 Executive Committee meeting says regarding the timing of consideration of the motion to request Rogers Television broadcast Executive Committee meetings (whether the two are contradictory depends on the wording and interpretation of certain motions; the committee could have decided to deep six the Walker motion to focus on a web-based strategy). With that said, Andrusvic's response is much more promising than what came out of Executive Committee earlier this month.

"The City of Toronto will continue to expand the public's access to real-time committee-focused information via the internet. City staff will present a budget proposal for the 2009 fiscal year to provide live web streaming of Executive Committee, other Standing Policy Committees and Community Council meetings. Capital investments will be required to provide this service. The proposal will also include the archiving of these broadcasts so the public can view them at a time that's convenient, and potentially find and watch a specific item rather than having to watch the entire meeting.

"The web streaming will complement the Meeting Monitoring service, launched in 2007, which allows the public to track in near real-time the status of agenda items and the progress of discussions at Standing Policy Committees, Community Councils and the Board of Health (launched in 2007), and City Council (launched in 2008)."

The part of this comment that concerns me is the need to gain Council approval for the capital investment. My guess is there's money needed to retrofit City Hall's Committee Room 2 and the council chambers at the three civic centres that are now used for community council meetings with the necessary video equipment. But judging by Council's reluctance to pony up the relatively paltry amount of money needed for a functional lobbyist registry, this accountability and transparency mechanism might also be subject to sharpened knives. I hope my concern is entirely unwarranted.

Photograph by Grant MacDonald.

 

Comments

Neither the author nor Spacing necessarily agree with the comments posted below. Spacing reserves the right to edit or delete comments entirely. See our Comment Policy.

Vain? Council? That's a funny slip.

 
Post a comment
Police Board Begins Web Streaming
By